The number of people with unspent convictions
We regularly get asked how many people have unspent convictions.
Since the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act was amended in March 2014, the number of people whose conviction is unspent is expected to have reduced significantly, but nobody really knows by how much.
So, as a first attempt, we’ve pulled together some data which tries to do this, and the key findings are below.
- Before the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 reforms, which came into force on the 10th March 2014, there were approximately 2,514,987 individuals with unspent convictions in England & Wales.
- Following the reforms to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, which came into force on the 10th March 2014, there were approximately 735,652 individuals with unspent convictions in England & Wales.
- 7,232 individuals receive a conviction each year that can never become spent.
- 2.03% of people that apply for a basic disclosure in England & Wales have unspent convictions disclosed.
- 6.94% of people that apply for a basic disclosure in Scotland have unspent convictions.
- 89% of the basic disclosures that Disclosure Scotland carry out are for people in England & Wales.
Got a different way of working this out?
We are interested in hearing about the efforts of others to better define the number of people with unspent convictions. Please send your thoughts to firstname.lastname@example.org or comment on this post below.
- Unlock’s co-founder, Bob Turney, becomes a patron Posted on: Jan 9th, 2019
- Book now for our criminal record disclosure training on 24th April 2019 Posted on: Jan 9th, 2019
Our popular 'criminal record disclosure' training workshops continue…
- Winter 2018/19 Newsletter - What we've been up to Posted on: Jan 4th, 2019
Today we've published our winter 2018/19 newsletter. The…
- Some examples of people we've helped Posted on: Jan 4th, 2019
Looking back over the last couple of months, we’ve written up a few…
- Blog - Council sacks a woman with a criminal record that is nearly two decades old because they say she is a substantial risk to their reputation - what are the implications? Posted on: Dec 21st, 2018
The latest blog by Christopher Stacey looks at the news this week…