Case study – Kelly – Having an insurance policy cancelled due to a comparison company not providing full disclosure
Kelly contacted our helpline after she’d had her insurance policy cancelled due to the non-disclosure of her partner’s criminal record.
Kelly explained that she’d used a comparison website to get insurance quotes for a new van that she’d recently purchased. After disclosing her partner’s unspent conviction, she had been surprised to find that the prices quoted had been no way near as expensive as she’d imagined them to be. Although she’d never heard of the company offering the most competitive price, further research revealed that they were specialists in providing insurance to people with convictions. Kelly went ahead with the purchase and paid the first instalment.
A couple of days later she received a letter from the company stating that they were aware of her partner’s unspent conviction and were cancelling her policy due to this not having been disclosed to them. Kelly immediately contacted them to dispute this, stating that she had proof of disclosure, but the company were adamant that she had not disclosed and that when purchasing any future policy, she’d need to declare that she’d had a policy cancelled.
Frustrated that the insurance company would not help and concerned that she’d never be able to insure her van, Kelly spoke to one of our advisors.
It quickly became apparent that the insurer concerned was one of those on Unlock’s list of brokers and so it was important that we establish what had gone wrong in Kelly’s case.
Kelly provided us with copies of the screenshots she’d taken from the original comparison site which clearly set out the details of her partner’s conviction. We sent this to the insurer and asked them to look again at her case.
Several days later we were contacted by the insurer who confirmed that they had fully investigated the matter and found that despite Kelly disclosing the conviction to the comparison site, some coding on the comparison site had been set to ignore some of the data which was passed to insurers.
The insurer apologised for any problem that this had caused Kelly and were happy to amend their records to reflect that the policy hadn’t been cancelled due to non-disclosure. They also offered Kelly a small amount of compensation.
“Without the help of Unlock I’d never have got the result I got. I’m going to steer clear of comparison sites in the future and go direct to an insurer. Something I thought would save me time has just caused me a lot of anxiety and frustration”.
We’d always recommend individuals go directly to an insurer rather than a comparison website and always make sure you keep copies of what you’ve disclosed to the company. Comparison sites earn their money based on the number of quotes they can generate over their rivals and, as happened in Kelly’s case, can sometimes fail to pass on key bits of information which, in all likelihood, would limit the number of insurers that would be able to provide a quote.
Notes about this case study
This case study relates to Unlock’s casework.
Names and details have been changed to protect the identity of those involved.
- Blog - Government publishes summary of responses to call for evidence on the employment of people with convictions Posted on: Oct 17th, 2019
Last week, more than a year since the consultation closed, the…
- Autumn 2019 Newsletter - What we've been up to Posted on: Oct 4th, 2019
Today we've published our autumn 2019 newsletter. The newsletter…
- Just 3 places remaining for our criminal record disclosure training on 26th November - Book now! Posted on: Oct 2nd, 2019
Places are limited so please book early to avoid…
- Some examples of people we've helped Posted on: Sep 27th, 2019
Looking back over the last couple of months, we’ve written up a few…
- Monthly update - September 2019 Posted on: Sep 27th, 2019
We've just published our update for September 2019. This…