Case study – Albert – My daughter shouldn’t have been Disqualification by Association due to my caution
Following receipt of a caution for ABH, Albert contacted our helpline as he was extremely concerned that his caution could affect his daughter’s current job. Albert stated that his daughter was working in a nursery and had been told by her manager that it was company policy that if any member of her household was arrested she had a duty to inform her employers. Albert’s daughter had disclosed details of the caution and was worried that she would be sacked.
We explained to Albert the the nursery were likely to be using Disqualification by Association (DbA) legislation which meant that anybody providing care for children up to and including reception age had to disclose the unspent cautions/convictions of anybody they lived with. Employees who met this criteria would need to apply for a waiver from Ofsted before they could continue working.
We reassured Albert that as his caution was spent immediately, the DbA requirements did not apply and should therefore have no impact on his daughter.
A couple of days later Albert contacted us again to inform us his daughter had been suspended from work and had been asked to attend a disciplinary meeting as the nursery believed she’d delayed notifying them of the caution. We advised him that as his caution was spent, and had been disclosed in error by his daughter, the nursery should disregard it.
We provided Albert with further relevant information and advice which we believed his daughter would be able to make use of at her disciplinary meeting.
Several months later Albert forwarded us a copy of an email his daughter had received from the nursery which stated:
“There is no entitlement for us to require you to share any information relating to spent convictions of family members.
In this instance, there was confusion due to a mistaken belief that your father’s caution was not spent, therefore, ought to have been declared. I sincerely apologise for this confusion.”
He informed us that his daughter had now returned to work.
This case demonstrates how nursery’s and schools are often unaware of the correct rules relating to ‘Disqualification by Association’. This can lead to incorrect decisions being made and employees and their families suffering months of stress and worry.
However,if you have a good understanding of DbA, it is possible to successfully challenge an employers decision.
- Childcare Disqualification Requirements – Primary school teachers, nursery staff and others – ‘Disqualified by association’
- Scrapping the ‘Disqualification by association’ regulations that apply to primary schools and other non-domestic childcare setting
Notes about this case study
This case study relates to Unlock’s helpline.
Names and details have been changed to protect the identity of those involved.
- Almost three-quarters of applications for waivers from charity trustees or senior managers who face possible disqualification, have not yet been dealt with by the Charity Commission Posted on: Jul 16th, 2018
New rules that disqualify people from being senior managers or…
- Summer 2018 newsletter - What we've been up to Posted on: Jul 6th, 2018
Today we've published our summer 18 newsletter. The newsletter…
- Blog - Standing up to the government in the Supreme Court – Some reflections on last month’s landmark criminal record disclosure hearing Posted on: Jul 4th, 2018
The latest blog by Christopher Stacey reflects on last month’s…
- Unlock comment: Government announces scrapping of 'disqualification by association' in schools Posted on: Jul 2nd, 2018
Commenting on today’s news of changes to the childcare…
- Some examples of people we've helped Posted on: Jun 28th, 2018
Looking back over the last couple of months, we’ve written up a few…